Skip to content
Services

UX & Interface Design

Design is not the part where it gets made attractive. It is the part where it gets made right.

The most expensive mistakes in software are made before anyone writes code, in the decision about what the screens are and how work moves between them. Changing that on a whiteboard costs an afternoon. Changing it after development costs weeks.

So we design first, and we design around observed work rather than assumed work. We watch how the job is actually done today, including the workarounds people have quietly invented, then prototype the new flow and put it in front of the people who will use it while it is still cheap to change.

What You Get

Interviews and observation with the people who do the work
Information architecture and end-to-end flow mapping
Interactive prototypes you can click through before build
A component library that keeps the product consistent
Accessible, keyboard-navigable interface patterns
Responsive layouts that hold up from phone to wide desktop

When This Is the Right Fit

If any of these sound familiar, it is worth a conversation.

  1. 01

    Staff have built spreadsheets to work around the software

  2. 02

    Training new users takes far longer than it should

  3. 03

    The product grew by accretion and no longer hangs together

  4. 04

    You want to validate an idea before committing a budget

Common Questions

Can you design for something we build ourselves?

Yes. Design-only engagements are common. You get the research, the flows, the prototype, and a component library your own developers can build against, along with the reasoning behind each decision so the intent survives contact with implementation.

How much does accessibility add?

Almost nothing when it is designed in, and a great deal when it is retrofitted. Sufficient contrast, real keyboard navigation, sensible focus order, and proper labelling are choices made during design, not features added later. We treat them as part of the baseline.

What does "responsive" mean for a desktop application?

That it behaves properly across the range of screens your people actually use: a laptop at 1366 pixels wide, a docked monitor, and an ultrawide with the window at half width. Layouts should reflow rather than clip or force horizontal scrolling. For anything web-delivered, that extends down to phones and tablets.

Have a project in mind?

Tell us what the software needs to do and who has to use it. We will come back with a realistic scope, a timeline, and a price.